Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Smith's broadcast too much


Kenny Smith’s broadcast portion of the NBA’s 2011 Sprite Slam Dunk Contest was completely over the top. Although it was meant to be a show, his performance went beyond “infotainment” and ultimately took away from the contest.

The former NBA player coached 21-year-old Clipper player, Blake Griffin for the contest. Smith kept fans on their feet at The Staples Center Sunday and kept viewers and listeners at home with their ears covered.

His broadcast was mainly for entertainment and show, rather than actual reporting and play-by-play. His over the top methods including a choir and a car on the court hyped up Griffin’s performance and brought attention to a dunk that was nothing special.

Smith’s broadcasting directly affected Griffin’s win. Without him, it would’ve been more difficult for Griffin to win. Although he was annoying to watch and listen to, his main goal in getting Griffin to win the contest was achieved.

The next time Smith is allowed to broadcast a contest, I’ll be sure to watch it on MUTE.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Olympic Softball


Most little girls grow up playing with Barbie Dolls and dresses. Not me. When I was a kid, I grew up with a bat, softball and a pair of cleats. Most of my friends were dropped off at ballet or girl scouts, while I practically lived at softball complexes. Like most kids growing up, I had a dream: to one day play for the USA Olympic Softball Team.

Although I know now that this dream is almost unattainable now, I’ve made it relatively far in the softball world, playing for the Emerson College Softball team. That’s as far as I will go in my softball career, not because I’m not good enough to be on the Olympic team, but because the Olympic team doesn’t exist anymore. Softball and baseball have been dropped from the summer Olympics.

Softball first became an Olympic medal sport in 1996. Since then, the United States has won a gold medal every year, except for the last games in 2008. Softball and baseball will be the first two sports dropped from the Olympics in 69 years.

The US domination in the sport is a major factor for removing it. Other reasons include global interest in the sport. These reasons should not be enough to take softball out of the Olympics and crush the dreams of hundreds of thousands of girls over the world.

Looking back at past Olympic games, the US has indeed dominated. Although the team has managed to win a medal in every tournament, they have been defeated and have had close games. China, Australia and Japan are the United States toughest competition.

The US won their first gold medal in 1996. Although they won gold, they did lose to Australia (2-1) in round robin play.

At the 2000 Olympics the U.S. lost to Japan (2-1) in 11 inning in round-robin play. The U.S. proceeded to lose two more games (2-0) to China and (2-1) to Australia after. It was the first time in the history of USA Softball that a Women’s National Team lost three games in a row. The U.S. rebounded to win five consecutive games including wins in the playoffs over China (3-0) in 10 innings, Australia (1-0) and Japan (2-1) in eight innings in the gold medal game to capture its second consecutive gold medal.

The team proceeded to win the gold again in 2004 and was appointed the “Real Dream Team.”2008 brought the end to US domination at the Beijing Olympics. Japan beat the US (3-1) in the final game to win their first gold medal. The US took silver for the first time in Olympic history.

Yes the US is a dominant force in softball, but they can be beaten. Throughout the history of softball in the Olympics, the US has lost and played a lot of close games. There is no reason to remove a sport because of a country’s strong winning records.

US Olympian Crystl Bustos agrees that softball should not be taken out of the Olympics. Bustos started a softball league called Bustos Ultimates. Her program is “dedicated to instilling the 
excitement for the game, the value of good sportsmanship, and the 
determination to make each player strive to improve and be better players.” Bustos told the Palm Beach Post that removing softball from the Olympics crushes the dreams of the girls she started her program for.

I agree with her. Boys have tons of male professional athletes to look up to: David Ortiz, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady and many others. Growing up I had Olympians Jenny Finch and Crystl Bustos as idols. I had the pleasure of meeting Finch at a softball tournament a few months ago. I was extremely excited. It’s not everyday you get to meet one of your idols and and Olympic medalist. Finch sets an example

for girls around the world. I’m worried that girl’s growing up now will never get the chance to meet their female athlete idols or will never get the chance to play in the Olympics. Their dreams do not deserve to be taken away.

The fight is not over. Although softball has been cut for the next Olympics, there’s still hope for the future.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Article Reviews



Celtics:

Magic take the bait

http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball/celtics/articles/2011/02/07/magic_take_the_bait/

The article recapping the Celtics and Magic game is well written and entertaining. The lead draws the reader in and plays with the word “tricks,” which is clever since the Celtics were playing the magic. The angle of the article focuses on the “tricks” the Celtics used to beat the Magic this week. The reporter does a good job of balancing the angle with a re-cap of the game, which makes reading the article entertaining in addition to being informative. The quotes used were good, however they could’ve been trimmed down. There’s a lot of quote packing towards the end of the article. The article was enjoyable and painted a good picture for readers.




Bruins:

Bang up job done by Bruins over Stars

http://www.boston.com/sports/hockey/bruins/articles/2011/02/04/bang_up_job_done_by_bruins_over_stars/?page=1

This article written about the Bruins and Stars game really gives readers a lot of information about the history between the teams and what happened at the game this week. Without knowing what has happened in the past, the story wouldn’t make as much sense. The reporter did his homework. Someone that doesn’t usually follow the Bruins could understand what happened and why it did, which is necessary in sports journalism. The quotes go along with the re-cap nicely and the reporter does a nice job of balancing quotes and facts. He doesn’t overuse the quotes.


Super Bowl XLV:

Injuries not too much to overcome

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/articles/2011/02/07/injuries_not_too_much_to_overcome/?page=1

This article focuses mainly on the injuries to the Packers during the Super Bowl. Although the reporter angled his article around the injuries, he gives too much information. I felt that I was overloaded with information after reading the first five paragraphs, and didn’t really want to continue reading. The sentences were extremely long, and fact filled. I understand he wanted to prove the point of the Packers still being able to win despite all the injuries, I just think he could’ve presented the information better. The article gets easier to read towards the end, where the reporter focuses on what happened in the game and having quotes. He does a nice job of not having too many quotes and a good job of spacing them out. I didn’t mind that he focused on the injuries for the entire article because they played a major role in this Super Bowl.

All three articles used the feature approach. Each reporter did a nice job of balancing a re-cap of the game with some important angle. These angles make the articles more enjoyable to read and give the stories color. I could picture what happened during the game after reading them.